UNIFIED FIELD THEORY SOLVED?

It was a year ago in 2020 that the correct solution to gravity and cosmic expansion finally fell into place with a shock after struggling with strange contradictions in physics since 1972 when Denny Lee at MSU Bozeman first tried to explain the famous Twin Paradox. Sure, I could smell a Rocky Mountain skunk, but why would anyone take me seriously? But when the truth of the universe hit me in the eye with such force and clarity I lost respect for a high profession that had let itself become so hopelessly naive and corrupt.  

The "unified field theory" was not a result expected. I'd be sneered at to mention that I might seriously have a partial solution, but then realized the answer couldn't be far off in light of this new discovery. The Cosmic Expansion Model is like a beacon in the dark. Spare me, I'm just going to dig from memory what questions the unified field theory was meant to answer and show how the Cosmic Expansion Model can give answers. The Cosmic Expansion Model proves the size of the physical universe measured within is eternally fixed while expansion of the cosmic universe has accelerated to maintain the equal and opposite force of gravity. This is the fact. The real mystery is how or why this serious, fundamental feature of our existence has been ignored.

Cosmic expansion must accelerate at the speed of light or there could be no gravity. The idea has become firmly planted that distances between galaxies are increasing as a result of cosmic expansion as well Hawking's well supported belief that the universe has no boundary and everywhere is the center of expansion.  These are fundamentally conflicting ideas because if every point is the center of cosmic expansion then yardsticks would also be expanding and there would be no direct way of gauging true distance. Indeed, it is common knowledge that a yardstick when moved to a higher elevation (farther distance from a body of mass) will expand, but only as viewed by a remote observer. The person who carries the yardstick will see no differences because the yardstick's natural length can only be measured by means of the distance light travels in a given time and the clock rate will increase or shrink simultaneously with the yardstick. If we're talking about true cosmic expansion, we would see no differences in distances between galaxies when going back and forth through time even though we know expansion has taken place in the upper realm. Again, how do we know? Gravitational redshift is our faithful and true witness that objects recede in an upper dimension as they glom towards each other in our dimension. 

My  proof is based on infallible inference from red shift data that the path of light is through an expanding upper, massless dimension that exerts equal and opposite back pressure in the lower, physical dimension. This operation is also consistent with results of experiments ironically credited to Einstein’s theories without rational proof that demonstrate how clock rate and length change together throughout gradients of gravitational potential energy so that they remain the same locally. Cosmic expansion tells you that average distances between galaxies must remain fixed inside the bubble known as the fixed, physical universe, but so do those crucial experiments somehow 
seized on by Einstein. . . no measurable change in the average distance between galaxies should be valid, nor could redshift coming from an expanding, outer cosmic universe be taken as anything but rate of recession of two bodies in an upper universe that translate into gravitational potential in the lower, physical universe. Exploring how these two dimensions work together should give such a better understanding of reality that the unified theory gets lost in the shuffle of more important ideas. 

It follows that the rate of relative expansion will vary depending on the quantity and density of matter in a given region. Any distant large body of mass of fixed distance will demonstrate the phenomenon of red shift, but physicists don’t necessarily assign the cause as recessional velocity. Gravitational redshift is contributed by all matter and part of cosmic expansion as a whole. Recession does not take place on the physical level. Every particle in the universe is expanding and pushing against every other particle with a gravitational force proportional to its own mass.  From these facts should flow easy answers to questions posted by the unified field theory. 

The goal of the unified field as proposed by Einstein and his followers has been to "unify" the four fundamental forces, the strong force (nuclear attraction), the weak force (gravity), and electromagnetism. The connection between gravity and electromagnetism should henceforth be perfectly understood within the context of the Cosmic Expansion Model. The physicists miss the mark by assigning the cause of these forces as the action of different particles, such as a graviton that causes gravity. Good luck finding a particle that causes cosmic expansion and gravity. Gravity is the result of cosmic expansion as a property of matter. This perfectly ties together gravity and electromagnetism, the tie Einstein believed was key to a unified physics. The physicists have lost touch, that’s for sure. Measuring the redshift of our sun tells us exactly what the cosmic rate of expansion is between the sun and our own position as well as the gravitational potential. Gravity, light speed, clock speed, entropy and even time itself are all functions of cosmic expansion, so there should be no need anymore to ponder what the source of these processes is. Relative differences in any of them are measurable by means of the cosmic redshift discounting relative motion on the physical plane. All processes stem from the expansion in the cosmic dimension produced by matter in the lower dimension. 

As for the "strong interaction" binding subatomic particles, this also is likely a function of expansion on the smallest scale where Plank constants enforce the behavior of atoms. No particles need be invented to explain these things.