What Do I Look Like In The UPPER Dimension

If light is red shifted by objects while being propagated through the ether dimension, then you can be sure all objects including yourself exist and are visible there; otherwise, no red shift would appear on the physical level and no matching blue shift seen as objects fall to Earth. Every particle and group of particles including yourself has an outer boundary to an upper, cosmic dimension where motions and forces are reversed. Newton's third law: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In the upper dimension, if peeking inside the box, the Earth would be perceived as expanding faster than a falling object. Both dimensions are real. Which is more real? Any motion on the physical level inherits the force of equal and opposite motion from the ethereal dimension. The term “box,” is figurative. The universe is a physical sphere inside a much larger cosmic sphere. Why weren't experiments allowed to paint this picture instead of obscuring reality with the theory of relativity? 

You are expanding freely with a force equal to your weight in the upper dimension. The accelerating rate causes an equal and opposite force on the physical level not just holding you to the ground, but by holding molecules and limbs together and keeping you from floating away. Every particle of mass has its own expanding counterpart equal to the force of attraction to its neighbors. Your feet are being pushed at the rate of 9.8 meters/second by the product of the two rates of expansion between the Earth and your body. This is a physical fact, not the invention of a delusional crackpot ballsy enough to call out the immortal Einstein and his legion of lackeys called physicists. It is the only sound inference from all available data. Not only do you exist as a physical object without mass in the ether realm where you are expanding in all directions and everything is receding away, but that expansion produces the equal and opposite force of gravitational acceleration in the physical dimension that we perceive as gravity. Indeed, every action on our level is the result of an opposite action in the upper dimension. It's real, not imaginary, that we have an unseen, mirror image expanding into infinity at an accelerating rate. This is what the physicists are missing out on in their bid for more research dollars to investigate a Big Bang that never was. Your ethereal half is blowing herself away to hold all your parts together, so appreciate the sacrifice she makes. And it is the ethereal Earth that expands at a rate unseen but equal to the retrograde motion of falling bodies the physicists call gravity. Expansion propagates light which would otherwise be stationary. Expansion on the cosmic level confirms that interpretation by sending us redshift values disguised as gravitational force to the physicists. Eureka? 

Don't give me a Nobel, please. I've pointed the way for lucky mathematicians who get on board early to handily do the calculations and earn one for themselves. I just happened to have stumbled on the correct solution to the universe so the world doesn't have to live in darkness anymore. It took me fifty years of head scratching following years of grueling university training to prime the pump. I learned to penetrate to the heart of difficult problems, and finally finding peace from government fraud was finally able to think this one through. I am a mathematical hatchet hacking problem solving machine. Seriously, the world should know about this. Einstein be damned.  

Your ethereal body obeys the cosmic expansion property of mass by expanding into the upper dimension at the speed of light subject to being pushed off course by neighboring objects. Light itself is your companion being carried forward by the expansion of space and recording Doppler evidence for physicists to ponder at. Every push down here is a pull up there. Newton’s Third Law: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The acceleration of expansion, c/s, creates the back pressure, F = M*A, that freezes universal dimensions on the physical level solid so that the back pressure of gravity holds the sum of everything together. Meanwhile, from galaxy to galaxy distances are fixed, but light in the ethereal dimension keeps a faithful record of ongoing expansion on the cosmic level.  This, my fellow Einsteins, is why physicists see progressively larger intergalactic red shifts with distance and time, not recessional velocity. Our universe expands not, but the red shifts we observe tell us how much expansion has taken place in and outside of our box where we don’t have the sense to know it. That is the meaning of the Michelson-Morley, Pound-Rebka and Hafele-Keating experiments, not general relativity.

And so what than shall me make of the CMB, cosmic background radiation? It certainly isn't from any Big Bang, but it could be from an instantaneous creation of the universe. You can't extrapolate backwards from a physical expansion that never was, but you can interpolate cosmic expansion backwards to a point where the universe vanishes in an instant, and that could be the date of creation I invite you to calculate. This is the real Big Bang that cosmologists are looking for in all the wrong places, the point where there was no mass in the universe and suddenly there was, the same amount there is now because the rate of cosmic expansion is fixed as we can confirm by looking at the units of G. Then again, the square root of something is always something, so extrapolating backwards may never get you to that point. Wrong again, Einsteins, too bad, so sad. The universe never had a beginning! I don’t think I can talk to my Christian friends like this or they'll send me to Hell in a hand basket. But when you're right, you're right.

Shoot, now I get it. The fourth dimension is our anti matter half. Anti matter would by definition have the property of anti gravity. This is the answer to the long pondered question, where is all the anti matter which should be half of everything? Hey, Sherlock, it's all around, sucking us into the vacuum in the middle.  Just kidding.  Five, four, three two one, Albert Einstein, here I come... six, seven eight nine, Albert, I'm gonna make your face look just like mine.
Are you looking at that Dilbert comic where he asks the construction worker, "I made an anti Dilbert, but I don't know how to get him out of the chamber without him being annihilated by matter." The guy says, "Well, if you don’t know how to do it and he’s the the anti you, that means he'd know how." So Dilbert goes to his anti self and the guy is looking through the sub portal and says, "Matter screen 150. Duhhhh...." Now tell me this Dilbert comic isn't prophetic. This guy could be a mathematician. 

Hmmm... does that explain what those aliens and their fancy ships are up to? Of course. Missing time, anti gravity, semi solid vehicles that disappear and reappear. They’re using anti matter to manipulate gravity with some sort of reactor, maybe the element 115 Bob Lazar claimed was used in alien vehicles he claims he saw at Area 51. The government just ignores him and won’t bother to assassinate him after sufficiently shooting off his mouth. Maybe the government would get farther if it pulled its quit focusing on it tax machine out pull its little head out of the dark place, dumped Einstein and got with the Cosmic Expansion Model. Reality is so much more interesting and gives us a shot at catching up to the aliens.  

Turns out we're not as isolated or safe as we thought. Way too complacent. It's a pretty good bet that whoever gets a grasp on this model will leap frog ahead in evolution and technology. A lot of existing knowledge will have to be discarded and a lot restarted from the ground up. Instead of walking around with mental pictures of the Big Bang, you can fund research into the Upperland. Our presence there does not go unnoticed. There's a lot to learn about the ether universe. It is a physical fact that it is being invaded by our expanding presence and pushes back to give us the safety of the gravity we were taught was a pull. The textbooks must be rewritten. They must. The truth must come to light!

The title Upperland is a play on the 1884 book, Flatland by Edwin Abbott. I read it in about 1963 in the dark, kneeling on the concrete floor, MSU Bozeman library dusty archives.  The hero tries to explain to his 2D peers that there is something above the sharp points of angles and spongy bounces of circles, but they can’t imagine what up could be like and are convinced it doesn’t exist. I don't remember the plot all that well, but I think  he was tossed in jail for heresy or something like that. Not likely I'll go to jail, but not likely I’ll make the cover of Time, either, and if the physicists have their way with me, well... You know it won’t be pretty.  Now is the time for all good mathematicians to come to the aid of the truth. 

Not only are all particles of mass both the center of cosmic expansion and the boundary to the upper dimension, but all objects create their own separate universe with each its own boundary to the upper dimension which they occupy simultaneously like mirror images. Motion in the physical dimension is opposite the ethereal dimension . Is this a surprise? Newton's Third Law states that every action creates an equal and opposite reaction. The sides of our box, or more correctly fixed dimensions enforced by the fixed ratio of length and clock rate, are taking a pounding from the recoil of celestial balls expanding on the cosmic side. The recoil squeezes space inside the physical boundary forcing the same balls in the lower dimension to squeeze together with the force of gravity. Expressing this face is awkward, but if the natural property of matter to expand is prevented on a lower level by the fixed ratio of time and space, matter on that level will be forced to move opposite the expansion on the higher level. This isn’t simple imagination, it’s a fact made apparent by scientific experiments that has been obscured by bogus theories.     

Now, a fair question. Which dimension is most real? Which is it, the chicken or the egg that comes first? The upper dimension must be more real because the physical dimension is contained within it. It has no mass but is crammed with energy, energy that was most likely compressed into matter to spawn our little universe. We being the shadow should be respectful of the upper land from where the motion of all things is perceived correctly and which forces us lower beings to dance like Pinocchio at the end of a string. 

Personally, I think the upperland is the chicken and we the incubating eggs waiting to be released at death and born into the ethereal dimension as ethereal beings. I say this because of the NDE, near death experience, I had in 1981. Mine was like many thousands of NDE’s experienced on operating tables. It was not made up or imagined. I was taken by the holy spirit and drawn into a tunnel  converging to a point which spoke to me the “Union Of All Things” as I approached. At the end of the tunnel I was stopped for a moment with a crown over my head, then entered the place Paul referred to as the third Heaven. Things there have no mass but consist of living light which emanates with profound personal qualities saturated with the living love of God. Now I know that story doesn't fit the rules of science or math, but it doesn't seem like a coincidence, either. If not the upper dimension beyond the cosmic universe, it was a higher dimension than that, the home of God.   

I’m really hoping to get a Ph.D. in mathematics for this book. Yes, it doesn't conform to the required format for a thesis, but it's the most important discovery in world history and will tumble the pillars of physics and cosmology if the right ears hear it. Why not give it a chance? The physicists and worshippers of the Einstein they only pretend to understand will have none of it, we know that. Only you mathematicians can rescue humanity and science from the darkness of Einstein, relativity and the Big Bang and go on to find all the answers science can give us. 

If you're wondering why my 1978 statistical theorem is appended, there are several reasons. A committee member can trace the complex algebra required for a difficult proof worthy of good credit towards a Ph.D. and validate that I don’t suffer from foolish thinking, but can penetrate deeply into mathematical relationships and back insights up 
with complex formal proofs acceptable to professional mathematicians. The randomized block theorem gives a new parameter giving precise measures of consistency for complex data sets. For example, it could be used to analyze the number grades given by committee members for consistency and possibly even calculate a probability of them being significant. Indeed, we can use the same statistical design to prove that Hillary Clinton’s majority of the popular vote in 2016 could not be accepted as a significant difference by real statisticians who routinely use those designs in their work. The Cosmic Expansion Model has broader and more important significance. It is, in fact, the most important discovery in world history.

---