## MASS OF THE UNIVERSE CALCULATED FROM THE SPEED OF LIGHT

Imagine you really do see beyond into the ethereal dimension. You see that in your neck of the solar system the Earth is expanding outward at great velocity into the ethereal dimension with you trailing behind. Every object is rapidly receding away from every other at different rates depending on the mass of each. You see how the recession is causing light beams at the crest of expansion and boundary to the lower universe to shift towards the red end of the spectrum between celestial bodies. Since the rate of expansion depends on the concentration of mass, the larger bodies such as black holes are zooming away the fastest. Light has no real velocity. It would be at rest if not for expansion at the edge of the universe stretching it out at the speed of light. A red shift is seen whenever photons overtake and collide with objects of mass in the outer sphere, but the objects themselves experience no expansion due to constraints of space and time within the physical dimension.

Being a remote observer in the ether, you have no trouble seeing that vigorous expansion is the property of matter and that expansion in the upper dimension is creating a recoil in the lower dimension felt as gravity. The greater the rate of expansion in the upper realm, the greater the Doppler red shift seen in the physical realm that matches the opposing acceleration due to gravity. You can see now how the relative rates of expansion between celestial bodies or any two other points define the gravitational potential between them. The same is seen on Earth as the rate of expansion of Earth matches the value of g near the surface. You see other red shifts between Earth and stars and distant galaxies. These all tell us by easy calculations the rate at which objects are receding in the upper dimension and the opposing pull of gravity between them on the physical plane. You see the physicists scratching their heads over the progressive redshift of far off galaxies. They don’t realize that light has had to travel by expanding into an upper dimension to a size many, many times its original, continuing at an accelerating pace while the fixed, physical universe within it has remained the same as it always was and always will be.

The difference in expansion since light left the most distant galaxies billions of years ago is unbelievably great, so it appears to the physicists who don’t know that light travels in an outside dimension at an accelerating rate that the universe is expanding at a rate greater than the speed of light. You can Google this up. In reality, rates of expansion are fixed to the speed of light, c, and the size of the universe we live in is fixed beginning to end. The upper and outer universe expands at the velocity of light, C, which increases every second at the rate of c. That’s right, the speed of light must increase at the speed of light every second to enforce the force of gravity in the lower dimension, and so the rate of expansion of the universe on the cosmic level increases at rate c every second as it always has. Over billions of years that would make the outer rate of expansion, but C, far greater than our tiny, fixed value of c. So, it isn’t saying much if the physicists calculate greater rates of expansion than c. We hope the James Webb telescope will confirm that and not blame the Big Bang.

The velocity of light, c, that we measure in the lower, fixed dimension is fixed as the instantaneous rate of cosmic expansion proportional to total, fixed mass, M. This insight provides us with a valuable tool garnered from the Michelson-Morley experiment that tragically was seized by Einstein and wiped out the last, feeble resistance to his theory of relativity. Are there any real mathematicians left in this world of darkness? They would know from the Cosmic Expansion Model that light is propagated only in the ether dimension where collisions with receding objects causes Doppler shift. The same objects are not receding by the measurements of physicists. They don’t want to look stupid by confessing they don’t know why, so they invented gravitational shift and banned questions from nosy conspiracy theorists.

The differential rate of expansion matched by gravitational potential on the physical level determines the degree of redshift and increase in velocity of light waves, so we know for certain that only expanding space could be responsible for propagation of light or any electromagnetic wave. Therefore, if c is constant throughout the universe as some believe, then only mass M could be responsible for the value of c and that c could represent nothing other than the instantaneous rate of expansion of the universe. These are not idle words about ideas. Proof is self evident and equates to nothing less than the greatest discovery in world history and doom to the physicists.

The reason that the velocity of the two beams in the Michelson-Morley experiment were the same in all directions is that space expands in all directions at the same rate in the ethereal dimension that stretches it away from its source. This is the only possible reason this result could be found. It’s amazing to me that nobody since Newton over three hundred years ago caught on. But I say everybody deserves a right to the truth, so relativity be damned. The grand prize for the lucky mathematician is calculating M, mass of the universe, from the speed of light, c. Treat c as one big Doppler shift and use the Doppler equations to figure it out. Spare me if I can’t or won’t calculate M myself. The mathematicians need to do their share of the work. Remember, we can also ferret out mass M from Newton’s G as equal to radius (of the physical dimension) squared, R^2, divided by G times acceleration of c. The trouble with the G method is that we need to know the radius R of the universe to calculate M or vice versa. If the Doppler or some other method can give us M, then we have radius R of the physical dimension in the bag.

Since we are confident that the mass M of the universe is constant, and its fundamental property is expansion, and since we now know without question that there could have never been a Big Bang, then we are free to speculate on the origin of the universe beyond the absurdity of cooling from expansion. Instead, creation appears to have come about, if indeed it had any beginning at all, from the opposite force of expansion, the instantaneous compression of energy in the ethereal dimension into mass which in turn responds with the equal and opposite force of expansion back into the ethereal dimension. Don’t forget to mention that expansion from mass in the cosmic dimension by its nature produces an internal box around a physical dimension fixed by the one to one ratio of clock speed and length. Indeed, is it possible that the universe is like a dipole magnet, expanding on one end and contracting on the other? In any event, if the universe even had a beginning, creation came about because of a force of compression of an extremely large but finite amount of energy. Does it look like a willful act to you?

Being a remote observer in the ether, you have no trouble seeing that vigorous expansion is the property of matter and that expansion in the upper dimension is creating a recoil in the lower dimension felt as gravity. The greater the rate of expansion in the upper realm, the greater the Doppler red shift seen in the physical realm that matches the opposing acceleration due to gravity. You can see now how the relative rates of expansion between celestial bodies or any two other points define the gravitational potential between them. The same is seen on Earth as the rate of expansion of Earth matches the value of g near the surface. You see other red shifts between Earth and stars and distant galaxies. These all tell us by easy calculations the rate at which objects are receding in the upper dimension and the opposing pull of gravity between them on the physical plane. You see the physicists scratching their heads over the progressive redshift of far off galaxies. They don’t realize that light has had to travel by expanding into an upper dimension to a size many, many times its original, continuing at an accelerating pace while the fixed, physical universe within it has remained the same as it always was and always will be.

The difference in expansion since light left the most distant galaxies billions of years ago is unbelievably great, so it appears to the physicists who don’t know that light travels in an outside dimension at an accelerating rate that the universe is expanding at a rate greater than the speed of light. You can Google this up. In reality, rates of expansion are fixed to the speed of light, c, and the size of the universe we live in is fixed beginning to end. The upper and outer universe expands at the velocity of light, C, which increases every second at the rate of c. That’s right, the speed of light must increase at the speed of light every second to enforce the force of gravity in the lower dimension, and so the rate of expansion of the universe on the cosmic level increases at rate c every second as it always has. Over billions of years that would make the outer rate of expansion, but C, far greater than our tiny, fixed value of c. So, it isn’t saying much if the physicists calculate greater rates of expansion than c. We hope the James Webb telescope will confirm that and not blame the Big Bang.

The velocity of light, c, that we measure in the lower, fixed dimension is fixed as the instantaneous rate of cosmic expansion proportional to total, fixed mass, M. This insight provides us with a valuable tool garnered from the Michelson-Morley experiment that tragically was seized by Einstein and wiped out the last, feeble resistance to his theory of relativity. Are there any real mathematicians left in this world of darkness? They would know from the Cosmic Expansion Model that light is propagated only in the ether dimension where collisions with receding objects causes Doppler shift. The same objects are not receding by the measurements of physicists. They don’t want to look stupid by confessing they don’t know why, so they invented gravitational shift and banned questions from nosy conspiracy theorists.

The differential rate of expansion matched by gravitational potential on the physical level determines the degree of redshift and increase in velocity of light waves, so we know for certain that only expanding space could be responsible for propagation of light or any electromagnetic wave. Therefore, if c is constant throughout the universe as some believe, then only mass M could be responsible for the value of c and that c could represent nothing other than the instantaneous rate of expansion of the universe. These are not idle words about ideas. Proof is self evident and equates to nothing less than the greatest discovery in world history and doom to the physicists.

The reason that the velocity of the two beams in the Michelson-Morley experiment were the same in all directions is that space expands in all directions at the same rate in the ethereal dimension that stretches it away from its source. This is the only possible reason this result could be found. It’s amazing to me that nobody since Newton over three hundred years ago caught on. But I say everybody deserves a right to the truth, so relativity be damned. The grand prize for the lucky mathematician is calculating M, mass of the universe, from the speed of light, c. Treat c as one big Doppler shift and use the Doppler equations to figure it out. Spare me if I can’t or won’t calculate M myself. The mathematicians need to do their share of the work. Remember, we can also ferret out mass M from Newton’s G as equal to radius (of the physical dimension) squared, R^2, divided by G times acceleration of c. The trouble with the G method is that we need to know the radius R of the universe to calculate M or vice versa. If the Doppler or some other method can give us M, then we have radius R of the physical dimension in the bag.

**Creation of the Universe: Mass From Compression of Energy**Since we are confident that the mass M of the universe is constant, and its fundamental property is expansion, and since we now know without question that there could have never been a Big Bang, then we are free to speculate on the origin of the universe beyond the absurdity of cooling from expansion. Instead, creation appears to have come about, if indeed it had any beginning at all, from the opposite force of expansion, the instantaneous compression of energy in the ethereal dimension into mass which in turn responds with the equal and opposite force of expansion back into the ethereal dimension. Don’t forget to mention that expansion from mass in the cosmic dimension by its nature produces an internal box around a physical dimension fixed by the one to one ratio of clock speed and length. Indeed, is it possible that the universe is like a dipole magnet, expanding on one end and contracting on the other? In any event, if the universe even had a beginning, creation came about because of a force of compression of an extremely large but finite amount of energy. Does it look like a willful act to you?