## EINSTEIN BUSTED: Cosmic Expansion Model Wins Over Standard Model

Physics is a farce as Bryan Wallace described in his 1993 book, The Farce of Physics. I am NOT going to convince you, but reveal to you by degrees, why Einstein's relativity is the swindle Essen asserted, but for reasons not entirely understood sound reason has fallen on deaf ears and nonsense in the name of Einstein has enabled physics to be taken over by quacks. The essay by Louis Essen, inventor of the atomic clock, "Relativity: Joke or Swindle?" said it right. The Standard Model of the Universe is the punch line. This I have tried to explain, only to be banned by the physicists for promoting conspiracy theory. What conspiracy? It seems I’m the only one since Newton to properly interpret the data and use it to construct the straightforward, consistent, mathematically correct cause of gravity and model of the universe. If the truth has value, then the Cosmic Expansion Model of the Universe will defeat Einstein and the standard model.

After more than a hundred years of poppycock sowed in the mind of the masses, I come swinging the sword of truth. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, said Carl Sagan. Here you find extraordinary proof. A well prepared mind will not be disappointed. This isn't a conspiracy theory. I am not a crackpot as most may have been. I'm not going to waste time trying to convince you, but reveal the extraordinary truth to the full satisfaction of any ordinary man or woman worthy of to be a mathematician. For the first time in history I herein prove that the Cosmic Expansion Model of the Universe by Foos Research, not the standard model based on foolish gimmicks, is the correct model of the universe. That proof relies on proper interpretation of the famous Michelson-Morley experiment that falsely verified Einstein's nonsensical frames of reference in relativity. The correct inference clearly proves cosmic expansion to be the cause of gravity.

Take a ride with me to the scale of reality that Einstein aspired to. We use the high powered microscope of our imaginations. The more familiar you become the sooner you will realize how you've been swindled by Einstein and his clique. Let me take you into that reality of the very, very tiny with the help of some YouTube videos made under Foos Research. In the first you see a small clock beside a bigger clock. The little clock is near the surface of the Earth and the bigger one thousands of miles away. Or the little one could be down at your feet and the bigger on your wall. It doesn't matter because our imaginations can easily adjust the degree of magnification and verify the facts. The effect is viewed from a far off fixed point Einstein called a remote observer. The Earth clock is at the left and the bigger clock a few million miles in distant space. The clocks show how time is running more slowly near a source of gravity than from a distance away where the clock at the higher gravitational potential is moving much faster. The color of the clocks also tell us that light that has left Earth has shifted from a bluish color on Earth to a reddish color, at least as seen by remote, not local observers, as Einstein called them. Length has also increased, hence a bigger clock by as reckoned by our remote viewer.

If anyone takes the trouble to move from the smaller clock to the bigger, he will find that not only has clock speed increased, but the clock has grown, and the meter stick has gotten longer. Move the clock up or down and it speeds up or slows down while growing larger or smaller. Carefully observe that the mover of the clock sees no differences in time or dimension. Local observers see no changes in clock speed or length wherever they take their clocks and meter sticks, even though both distance and clock speed are observed to change together by remote observers. This is because the definition of a meter is 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of a certain spectral line from krypton-86. Because wavelengths of light shrink or expand with meter sticks depending on gravitational potential, and clocks shrink or expand at the same rate, local observers will see no changes in local dimensions or rates of clocks. Why? Because we’re locked in a box called the physical dimension. Local observers not only see no changes within an expanding space however real to anybody outside the box, but expansion of space up above is trapped and redirected to the force of gravity.

We will now broaden our field of view and move the smaller clock to the center of a black hole. This is the "singularity" physicists are so fond of. Note that there the rate of time has slowed to zero and the size of the clock has shrunk to a singular point. But we know from experimental verification of Einstein's relativity that the relationship between clocks and distance prevent local observers from seeing or experiencing such changes. They are trapped inside the space-time box where the effects of those changes are instead manifested as the force of gravity. So, do the physicists lie to us? It sure is a Rocky Mountain fib on some level. Established facts of time and space are overlooked to strengthen the case for singularities which can be easily shown false within physical dimensions of known experience. The force of gravity would be fatal, but your sense of time and space are unchanged. For cosmic expansion on the whole, there wouldn’t be the slightest change sin length or time even over billions of years. The density of the universe remains fixed with G as long as mass M is not messed with. Maybe we are already stuck in the mother of all black holes. You tell me, but have full confidence in everything I've said. I've revealed the deepest secrets of the universe for the first time in human history. It should be worth your time and the effort to let others know.

Fix in your mind how light waves would look near the surface of Earth. We could liken them to the spiral of rings in the video that have bigger diameters higher up the stack, and that get redder in color. The bottom ring is the smallest. We can pretend it is the smallest possible and therefore the Planck length. The diameter or wave carries with it the smallest unit packet of energy, the Planck energy. The time it takes the photon to complete its path around the ring must be the Planck time. The beam forming the spiral consists of a steady stream of photons starting out with short, high energy wavelengths that expand as they leave Earth and become red shifted (as seen by remote observers).

The video uses a stack of such rings to show how light frequency changes, and the circumference of the rings expands with distance from a source of gravity. This is called the blue shift coming towards Earth and the red shift going away. If Alice drops a book on relativity from the top of the stack, it will accelerate at about 9.8m/s toward the ground. The energy of impact depends on the height dropped and is calculated by Newton as force equals mass times acceleration due to gravity. Here is where you need to give serious attention. The amount that light is red shifted from the ground to the top of the tower is equal to the product of rates of expansion between the book and Earth which equal the velocity of the book when it hits the ground. The velocity can also be calculated using the Doppler equations for the red shift observed between the top and bottom of the fall. The physicists don't seem to know about that despite it being the crux of the Pound-Rebka experiment touted to validate Einstein when the math used was nothing more than Newton’s formula for potential energy. They claim that the red shift from distant galaxies is equal to recessional velocity and that's how fast the universe is expanding, but overlook the same frequency shifts by all nearby bodies of mass that show no recession at all. They would never dare explain gravitational redshift as expansion in an upper dimension. because then they’d have to explain to the masses that there was after all no Big Bang. Firing squads have been used to correct lesser offenses.

Hopefully, you can see that there was no Big Bang or any possibility of one. The progressive recessional velocity between galaxies is mistaken for progressive recessional velocity in an upper dimension. All dimensions inside our physical sphere have been and always will be internally constant as far as the physical universe is concerned.

Meanwhile, the cosmic size of the universe as measured from the upper dimension has increased exponentially. The universe has always and always will be expanding at an accelerating rate, so the big bang is always just around the corner and getting bigger. In comparison, expansion of the early universe was a crawl. I, too, even knowing the fixed ratio of length and clock speed, had been taken in by Einstein and speculated that cosmic expansion could decrease mass density of the universe. That would require a lower value of Newton’s gravitational constant, G. That would reduce the force of gravity and increase distances between galaxies and thereby save the Big Bang from blowing up. But scrutiny of the units of G prove it could not possibly be a variable.

With no possibility of error, none of the observed intergalactic redshift could be due to recessional velocity as claimed by cosmologists. I had to abandon my own hope of a big bang. The expansion is real and progressive, but takes place on the cosmic level. It is not experienced within the physical universe. This may go against the notions pounded into you by the media, but an outer dimension is required to put the pieces of physical reality in their correct relation to each other. G cannot be made to vary in such a way as Einstein falsely represented to appease the Big Bangers. There never was and never could have been a Big Bang, nor is the physical universe we know and see ever expanded or contracted. It has measured the same since its beginning, if it had one, and always will measure the same internally.

Static dimensions inside the universe are proved by the same experiments that Einstein converted to his own purposes, overlooking proof of an expanding cosmic universe with an eternally static universe trapped within it. The relationship between gravity, time and distance was the core concept of all of Einstein's relativity and fame, then he slipped and missed the point. You tell me why. This is so important to know, but understanding cometh not through relativity. The entire world has been swindled by a cock eyed story of a standard model and a Big Bang. It's so very important to understand how deeply personal that is for people. Believe what I'm telling you. Expand your mind and try to comprehend what your universe is really like. This is all consistent with Newton's laws and many famous experiments touted to prove a potpourri mash of meaningless equations called relativity. It should be apparent that promoting such beliefs by those in positions of authority is as much a crime as any other crime .

Try it again. We all agree that 9.8m/s is the instantaneous change in velocity caused by gravitational force at the Earth’s surface. It matches the blue Doppler shift resulting from the motion of two bodies approaching each other at the rate of 9.8 meters per second. It also matches the recessional Doppler effect in a real upper dimension where the same two bodies are receding from each other at 9.8 meters per second. If we push aside the barrier to knowing this by the physicists’ meaningless term “gravitational” redshift, then you have the truth of the Cosmic Expansion Model in a nutshell. Cosmic expansion is the mirror image of gravity. Einstein showed no sign of knowing the truth, but in one of his papers curiously claimed that the falling of objects to Earth was not as perceived. Instead, falling objects were fixed in position, and the Earth was accelerating upward to collide with them. Please don't say Einstein never said any such thing because I've been through this many times, and this he did say. Funny, because no physicist would dare credit him with that, but from the perspective of expanding space in the fixed, ethereal dimension, that's just how it would appear, at least if you could look through a peephole inside the neighboring dimension of physical spacetime. It’s a mystery why he made such a point, but it could be he had become impressed with Friedman's cosmic expansion model of the universe according to some. If he had adopted such a model, then he wouldn't have become the greatest scientist of all time, and we the masses wouldn’t been sucked into the Big Bang.

Except for intergalactic red shifts, we were good with Einstein. To measure the degree of cosmic (not physical) expansion, we must do so from a point entirely outside the physical dimension. As one of Einstein's advisers mentioned, a different coordinate system is required. Unfortunately, Einstein’s invention, inertial frames of reference, doesn’t get us anywhere except confused, no matter what the physicists claim. You can’t invent the right coordinate system, you have to find it. The Cosmic Expansion Model is the only correct coordinate system. No matter how many times you hear that relativity has it nailed, don’t believe it. Believe what really makes sense. Understanding is attained by considering that light travels outside the physical dimension where redshift reveals the upper, expanding cosmic dimension. Expansion on that level exerts the kickback of gravity within the constrained space of physical dimensions fixed by the ratio of length and clock speed. All we need to know that we are expanding into the upper dimension is correct inference from redshift.

The Hafele-Keating and Pound-Rebka experiments proved to an amazed world that clocks run more slowly when closer to a body of mass where the force of gravity is stronger. They also proved that length shrinks accordingly if are to take the definition of length seriously. These differences are real, but only observed by remote viewers. How remote must they be? The point should not have anything to do with relativity, only that such differences are not a matter of experience in the region in which they occur and are thus a matter of inference. Space-time is not the mysterious curvature of Einstein’s model, but the fixed space/time ratio of meters and clocks that preserves fixed dimensions contained within the expanding upper dimension to give the world the force of gravity and reassurance of position.

In practice, differences in lengths and clock speeds only become apparent when observing larger bodies of mass like the sun from millions of miles away. This is what the Eddington expedition proved which was followed by a ticker tape parade in New York for Einstein. Nobody noticed that the real results from these experiments mean that measurements can’t be relied on within a closed system. The experiments show that there is a cosmic expansion not perceived inside our physical dimension. Since the rate of expansion of space which carries light is greater near the sun, the beam’s rate of travel will slow and veer off course. This observation by Eddington’s expedition matched Einstein’s prediction made only weeks ahead of the experiment. That’s all we ever heard about it without any evidence of a gain in understanding by anyone. Time dilation, frames of reference, Lorentz contractions. It’s all bullshit, boys, nothing but bullshit. The same experiments prove the Cosmic Expansion Model to be the correct interpretation.

Before the Michelson-Morley experiment, physicists reasoned that light must be transmitted through a medium as are all waves. This they called the ether, but there was no other evidence of an ether. If there was an ether, reasoned the physicists, light would travel at different speeds depending on the direction of travel. The results of Michelson and Morley’s interferometer showed no difference in the velocity of light no matter which direction it went. The only possible conclusion for all was that there is no ether, the final verification of Einstein's relativity and rise to everlasting fame. But we all have minds of our own. Is it not clear enough that light is not transmitted, but propagated by a force perpendicular to the course of travel? If I’m not the smartest guy in all of history, then the truth has been deliberately withheld from the public. Other experiments also proved that the constriction of time and distance means local observers such as an interferometer would measure no difference in the velocity of light, but not that changes matching the force of gravity don’t occur on another level. I see no excuse for Mr. Einstein. His legacy wasn’t genius unless marketing the butchery of reality is genius.

It was Einstein’s own observation that a "remote" observer would see a red shifted, accelerating beam of light escaping a gravitational field and a decelerating blue shifted beam approaching a body of mass. Einstein himself had established that the speed of light is not constant over a gravitational potential difference while at the same time demonstrating how clocks and meters change to nullify those effects for local observers. Imagine that Michelson-Morley aimed their interferometer up instead of horizontal where Einstein himself claimed the speed of light should vary? Figure it out. The outward traveling beam's wavelength and speed increase for remote observers. Let's say the upward bound beam travels a million miles for one second and a downward beam travels half a million miles because its clock runs half as fast. The downward beam's meter will be only half as long, but being there are half as many wavelengths along its local path, it travels the same distance locally. The result is that no matter how far each beam travels, both will have measured identical elapsed time and distance on return to the interferometer. The beam is assisted or resisted by the expansion of space from Earth in the ether dimension depending on whether it is traveling up or down. You’ve been had.

The velocity of light measures the same for all local observers because it is propagated by the expansion of space outside fixed “space-time,” the same expansion responsible for the opposing force of gravity. Is it not strange that the velocity of light increases when leaving Earth while bodies of mass are pulled back towards the Earth? If only Einstein could tell us what force causes light to accelerate against the force of gravity at exactly the same rate as the force of gravity. Oh, I forgot. Einstein explains nothing.

This is the crux of it all. If the logic of great physicists before Einstein is properly applied, this can only mean that there is indeed something like an ether that assists light in one direction and resists it in the opposite. Like redshift, the effect coincides with gravitational force and can only be explained by expansion of space in a dimension outside our own. The beam moves away from the center of the Earth boosted by expanding space while a blue shifted light beam approaching Earth is opposed by the same expansion causing it to slow down by the reckoning if a remote clock with a compressed wavelength. Easy to imagine if you try. The only alternative to the expansion of space would be a physical ether streaming from the centers of mass. There is only one logical possibility. The ether is in effect the expansion of space outside the physical universe which propagates light. This is why redshift isn’t visible to local observers but clearly seen by remote observers. All the experiments credited to Einstein’s relativity prove nothing except cosmic expansion in an upper dimension that propagates light and stems from mass. Since that expansion is prevented inside the box where time and distance are conjoined, we experience the force of gravity instead of expansion.

The Michelson-Morley experiment proved what the powers didn’t want to know, that there are fixed external coordinates through which all space is expanding, and since all points are the center of expansion (the physicists got some of it right), the velocity of light is fixed in proportion to mass M of the universe plus or minus any Doppler effects caused by local objects. Therefore, relative rate of expansion determines the strength of the equal and opposite gravitational force. Expanding space at an accelerating rate outside the physical dimension is the fundamental and intrinsic property of matter that allows us to exist. This expansion is felt as the equal and opposite force of gravity in accordance with Newton’s third law of motion. Redshift from remote galaxies is no different from gravitational redshift, both being caused by recessional velocity in an expanding dimension not felt within our physical “box” but seen as the resulting redshift. Cosmic expansion can only be seen directly from outside the expanding universe at the cusp of expansion that propagates light. Hence, the Cosmic Expansion Model by Foos Research is the new and rightful model of the universe.

Expansion of space into the ethereal dimension can be measured indirectly by the Doppler shifts unreasonably attributed to gravitation. Though the expansion is not perceived, the equal and opposite force of expansion is opposed inside the box by the fixed ratio of clock speed and length and manifests as gravity. The force of stifled expansion from one object presses towards neighbors whose own expansion multiplies the combined force. The universe is a perfect sphere, not a box, of course, but the analogy of a box with well defined boundaries may be helpful.

There is no expansion perceived on the physical plane but it can be accurately calculated from either the force of gravity or redshift measurements. Another video may (or may not) help conceptualize this. Focus your magnifying glass with another YouTube video. Between the two clocks running at different rates, we now have a giant star ship specially constructed by Foos Research to give you a tour to the outer dimension to see what the world is really like. The tip of the ship is noticeably larger and reddish colored than the much narrower and bluish fins near the bottom as it awaits take off from Florida. Inside, you find a very comfortable chair to relax in. To your left is a large, specially made window. When you push the button, another realm appears in the window which you know instantly is the ether realm.

You can't make out the ether shapes because they are flying by too fast, but you measure the rate at 9.8 meters per second plus an additional 9.8 meters in the next second and again the next and the next. You want to say that the rockets have fired and you’re blasting into outer space, but when you press the window’s off button you find yourself still sitting on the launch pad. Then it hits. Gravity is an illusion. Through the window, you see that instead of feeling the force of gravity, you are being pushed by the expansion of space in the cosmic dimension just like Einstein said. But everything around you in the ethereal dimension is receding away at the same rate. You can measure exactly how fast you are moving in relation to other receding bodies by measuring the red shift between you and them. You find from the Doppler shift that you are in fact being pushed away by an expanding Earth at an accelerated rate of g, 9.8 meters per second per second. How did Einstein figure that one out?

Any remote observer other than a physicist can verify that the red shift over a meter corresponds to a Doppler velocity of 9.8 meters per second. Now we can correctly identify the most accurate remote observer as the upper dimension with fixed position relative to cosmic expansion. From your star ship window your speed relative to the receding Earth matches the Doppler red shift between you and Earth and again matches the gravitational blue shift at your position. Light doesn’t travel through an ether or through anything but is propagated or resisted by the directional expansion of space, boosting its escape from Earth and resisting it on the way back. Light travels with or against expansion matching gravity because it defines the basic rate of expansion in the universe as a whole. The velocity of light is assisted by the expansion of physical space in the ether dimension because it is carried by nothing but expansion. From your window to the ether realm you see ether mile posts flashing by as expansion of space forces you against your chair at the rate of g, the same rate of acceleration experienced by light as it leaves Earth. When shifting your window view of the ethereal dimension you may wrongly perceive your rocket has taken off at the velocity of g, but soon realize it is you who are being carried by the expansion of space at an acceleration equal to g, the force of gravity in the physical realm. The Doppler shift you observe in the ether dimension matches the gravitational red shift while sitting in your chair in the physical dimension. This is the real deal. A beam of light heading to Earth will be traveling against the rate of expansion in the ether dimension which causes it to be blue shifted. Do you see it correctly now? Do you know what causes the force of gravity? Do you know that in the ether dimension you are expanding at a velocity and rate of increase equal to the value of the local gravitational constant where gravity is holding you to your chair?

Since we have to incorporate an ethereal dimension missing mass to explain our own lower physical dimension dominated by mass, maybe it’s fair to ask what exactly is in the ethereal dimension besides raw energy. If you were to suddenly lose your mass, what would happen? We are not robotic collections of chemicals. Your soul entered your body from the ethereal realm at conception where it has evolved over time. You simply borrowed the chemicals needed to host your temporary journey through the tunnel. I have no proof of this other than a near death experience (NDE) which is a personal, but profound experience shared by millions of trustworthy people who have had one themselves. Without exception they were never the same again. An ethereal dimension isn’t just a fact of science, but of experience for many who died on the operating table.

It is a fact that you are rocketing through space by the force of cosmic expansion even if this is not perceived. If you lose all your mass, your consciousness is instantly taken to the ether realm. You feel a burst of acceleration as you fade from the physical to the ethereal dimension. Since you are leaving the physical dimension, you may experience the Union of All Things when approaching the end of the tunnel. Most NDE experiences describe passing through the tunnel into a vivid realm without gravity or time. The tunnel is real, but only when you leave your body is it perceived. All your life you've been surfing the crest of cosmic expansion with the boundary to the ethereal dimension all around you. If you leave this universe your soul will immediately be drawn into the ether dimension at the end of the tunnel marking the boundary between physical and ethereal.

In his 1918 Dialog about “Objections to the Theory of Relativity'' Einstein sounds more like a tired old man than con artist. He emphasized the potential applicability of the ether concept in general relativity. He noted that “Lorenz brought a rigid substance embodying coordinate systems into play, but special relativity denied the existence of ether concepts. However, GRT is different,” he said, “and empty space has physical qualities characterized as the components of gravitational potential. This situation can very well be interpreted by speaking of an ether whose state varies from point to point. However, one has to be careful not to attribute to this ether any matter-like properties such as a distinct velocity at each point.” In this presentation in his own words he seeks to identify the qualities required of an ether. “Concepts might include ether as a cause of gravity, and as the source medium for the production of electric charge. The ether might conceivably take the form of a diffuse mixture of positive and negative electric charge.”

Fuzzhead or con man? Is he dodging the expansion of space into an ether dimension, or does he simply not understand the cosmic expansion model? I go back and forth, but lean towards thinking of him as an ordinary bloke who became progressively confused trying not be caught fixing his mistakes. How bizarre that makes me the greatest scientist of all time.

After more than a hundred years of poppycock sowed in the mind of the masses, I come swinging the sword of truth. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, said Carl Sagan. Here you find extraordinary proof. A well prepared mind will not be disappointed. This isn't a conspiracy theory. I am not a crackpot as most may have been. I'm not going to waste time trying to convince you, but reveal the extraordinary truth to the full satisfaction of any ordinary man or woman worthy of to be a mathematician. For the first time in history I herein prove that the Cosmic Expansion Model of the Universe by Foos Research, not the standard model based on foolish gimmicks, is the correct model of the universe. That proof relies on proper interpretation of the famous Michelson-Morley experiment that falsely verified Einstein's nonsensical frames of reference in relativity. The correct inference clearly proves cosmic expansion to be the cause of gravity.

Take a ride with me to the scale of reality that Einstein aspired to. We use the high powered microscope of our imaginations. The more familiar you become the sooner you will realize how you've been swindled by Einstein and his clique. Let me take you into that reality of the very, very tiny with the help of some YouTube videos made under Foos Research. In the first you see a small clock beside a bigger clock. The little clock is near the surface of the Earth and the bigger one thousands of miles away. Or the little one could be down at your feet and the bigger on your wall. It doesn't matter because our imaginations can easily adjust the degree of magnification and verify the facts. The effect is viewed from a far off fixed point Einstein called a remote observer. The Earth clock is at the left and the bigger clock a few million miles in distant space. The clocks show how time is running more slowly near a source of gravity than from a distance away where the clock at the higher gravitational potential is moving much faster. The color of the clocks also tell us that light that has left Earth has shifted from a bluish color on Earth to a reddish color, at least as seen by remote, not local observers, as Einstein called them. Length has also increased, hence a bigger clock by as reckoned by our remote viewer.

If anyone takes the trouble to move from the smaller clock to the bigger, he will find that not only has clock speed increased, but the clock has grown, and the meter stick has gotten longer. Move the clock up or down and it speeds up or slows down while growing larger or smaller. Carefully observe that the mover of the clock sees no differences in time or dimension. Local observers see no changes in clock speed or length wherever they take their clocks and meter sticks, even though both distance and clock speed are observed to change together by remote observers. This is because the definition of a meter is 1,650,763.73 wavelengths of a certain spectral line from krypton-86. Because wavelengths of light shrink or expand with meter sticks depending on gravitational potential, and clocks shrink or expand at the same rate, local observers will see no changes in local dimensions or rates of clocks. Why? Because we’re locked in a box called the physical dimension. Local observers not only see no changes within an expanding space however real to anybody outside the box, but expansion of space up above is trapped and redirected to the force of gravity.

We will now broaden our field of view and move the smaller clock to the center of a black hole. This is the "singularity" physicists are so fond of. Note that there the rate of time has slowed to zero and the size of the clock has shrunk to a singular point. But we know from experimental verification of Einstein's relativity that the relationship between clocks and distance prevent local observers from seeing or experiencing such changes. They are trapped inside the space-time box where the effects of those changes are instead manifested as the force of gravity. So, do the physicists lie to us? It sure is a Rocky Mountain fib on some level. Established facts of time and space are overlooked to strengthen the case for singularities which can be easily shown false within physical dimensions of known experience. The force of gravity would be fatal, but your sense of time and space are unchanged. For cosmic expansion on the whole, there wouldn’t be the slightest change sin length or time even over billions of years. The density of the universe remains fixed with G as long as mass M is not messed with. Maybe we are already stuck in the mother of all black holes. You tell me, but have full confidence in everything I've said. I've revealed the deepest secrets of the universe for the first time in human history. It should be worth your time and the effort to let others know.

Fix in your mind how light waves would look near the surface of Earth. We could liken them to the spiral of rings in the video that have bigger diameters higher up the stack, and that get redder in color. The bottom ring is the smallest. We can pretend it is the smallest possible and therefore the Planck length. The diameter or wave carries with it the smallest unit packet of energy, the Planck energy. The time it takes the photon to complete its path around the ring must be the Planck time. The beam forming the spiral consists of a steady stream of photons starting out with short, high energy wavelengths that expand as they leave Earth and become red shifted (as seen by remote observers).

The video uses a stack of such rings to show how light frequency changes, and the circumference of the rings expands with distance from a source of gravity. This is called the blue shift coming towards Earth and the red shift going away. If Alice drops a book on relativity from the top of the stack, it will accelerate at about 9.8m/s toward the ground. The energy of impact depends on the height dropped and is calculated by Newton as force equals mass times acceleration due to gravity. Here is where you need to give serious attention. The amount that light is red shifted from the ground to the top of the tower is equal to the product of rates of expansion between the book and Earth which equal the velocity of the book when it hits the ground. The velocity can also be calculated using the Doppler equations for the red shift observed between the top and bottom of the fall. The physicists don't seem to know about that despite it being the crux of the Pound-Rebka experiment touted to validate Einstein when the math used was nothing more than Newton’s formula for potential energy. They claim that the red shift from distant galaxies is equal to recessional velocity and that's how fast the universe is expanding, but overlook the same frequency shifts by all nearby bodies of mass that show no recession at all. They would never dare explain gravitational redshift as expansion in an upper dimension. because then they’d have to explain to the masses that there was after all no Big Bang. Firing squads have been used to correct lesser offenses.

Hopefully, you can see that there was no Big Bang or any possibility of one. The progressive recessional velocity between galaxies is mistaken for progressive recessional velocity in an upper dimension. All dimensions inside our physical sphere have been and always will be internally constant as far as the physical universe is concerned.

Meanwhile, the cosmic size of the universe as measured from the upper dimension has increased exponentially. The universe has always and always will be expanding at an accelerating rate, so the big bang is always just around the corner and getting bigger. In comparison, expansion of the early universe was a crawl. I, too, even knowing the fixed ratio of length and clock speed, had been taken in by Einstein and speculated that cosmic expansion could decrease mass density of the universe. That would require a lower value of Newton’s gravitational constant, G. That would reduce the force of gravity and increase distances between galaxies and thereby save the Big Bang from blowing up. But scrutiny of the units of G prove it could not possibly be a variable.

With no possibility of error, none of the observed intergalactic redshift could be due to recessional velocity as claimed by cosmologists. I had to abandon my own hope of a big bang. The expansion is real and progressive, but takes place on the cosmic level. It is not experienced within the physical universe. This may go against the notions pounded into you by the media, but an outer dimension is required to put the pieces of physical reality in their correct relation to each other. G cannot be made to vary in such a way as Einstein falsely represented to appease the Big Bangers. There never was and never could have been a Big Bang, nor is the physical universe we know and see ever expanded or contracted. It has measured the same since its beginning, if it had one, and always will measure the same internally.

Static dimensions inside the universe are proved by the same experiments that Einstein converted to his own purposes, overlooking proof of an expanding cosmic universe with an eternally static universe trapped within it. The relationship between gravity, time and distance was the core concept of all of Einstein's relativity and fame, then he slipped and missed the point. You tell me why. This is so important to know, but understanding cometh not through relativity. The entire world has been swindled by a cock eyed story of a standard model and a Big Bang. It's so very important to understand how deeply personal that is for people. Believe what I'm telling you. Expand your mind and try to comprehend what your universe is really like. This is all consistent with Newton's laws and many famous experiments touted to prove a potpourri mash of meaningless equations called relativity. It should be apparent that promoting such beliefs by those in positions of authority is as much a crime as any other crime .

**Rehashing The Connection Between Redshift, Expansion And Gravity**Try it again. We all agree that 9.8m/s is the instantaneous change in velocity caused by gravitational force at the Earth’s surface. It matches the blue Doppler shift resulting from the motion of two bodies approaching each other at the rate of 9.8 meters per second. It also matches the recessional Doppler effect in a real upper dimension where the same two bodies are receding from each other at 9.8 meters per second. If we push aside the barrier to knowing this by the physicists’ meaningless term “gravitational” redshift, then you have the truth of the Cosmic Expansion Model in a nutshell. Cosmic expansion is the mirror image of gravity. Einstein showed no sign of knowing the truth, but in one of his papers curiously claimed that the falling of objects to Earth was not as perceived. Instead, falling objects were fixed in position, and the Earth was accelerating upward to collide with them. Please don't say Einstein never said any such thing because I've been through this many times, and this he did say. Funny, because no physicist would dare credit him with that, but from the perspective of expanding space in the fixed, ethereal dimension, that's just how it would appear, at least if you could look through a peephole inside the neighboring dimension of physical spacetime. It’s a mystery why he made such a point, but it could be he had become impressed with Friedman's cosmic expansion model of the universe according to some. If he had adopted such a model, then he wouldn't have become the greatest scientist of all time, and we the masses wouldn’t been sucked into the Big Bang.

Except for intergalactic red shifts, we were good with Einstein. To measure the degree of cosmic (not physical) expansion, we must do so from a point entirely outside the physical dimension. As one of Einstein's advisers mentioned, a different coordinate system is required. Unfortunately, Einstein’s invention, inertial frames of reference, doesn’t get us anywhere except confused, no matter what the physicists claim. You can’t invent the right coordinate system, you have to find it. The Cosmic Expansion Model is the only correct coordinate system. No matter how many times you hear that relativity has it nailed, don’t believe it. Believe what really makes sense. Understanding is attained by considering that light travels outside the physical dimension where redshift reveals the upper, expanding cosmic dimension. Expansion on that level exerts the kickback of gravity within the constrained space of physical dimensions fixed by the ratio of length and clock speed. All we need to know that we are expanding into the upper dimension is correct inference from redshift.

The Hafele-Keating and Pound-Rebka experiments proved to an amazed world that clocks run more slowly when closer to a body of mass where the force of gravity is stronger. They also proved that length shrinks accordingly if are to take the definition of length seriously. These differences are real, but only observed by remote viewers. How remote must they be? The point should not have anything to do with relativity, only that such differences are not a matter of experience in the region in which they occur and are thus a matter of inference. Space-time is not the mysterious curvature of Einstein’s model, but the fixed space/time ratio of meters and clocks that preserves fixed dimensions contained within the expanding upper dimension to give the world the force of gravity and reassurance of position.

In practice, differences in lengths and clock speeds only become apparent when observing larger bodies of mass like the sun from millions of miles away. This is what the Eddington expedition proved which was followed by a ticker tape parade in New York for Einstein. Nobody noticed that the real results from these experiments mean that measurements can’t be relied on within a closed system. The experiments show that there is a cosmic expansion not perceived inside our physical dimension. Since the rate of expansion of space which carries light is greater near the sun, the beam’s rate of travel will slow and veer off course. This observation by Eddington’s expedition matched Einstein’s prediction made only weeks ahead of the experiment. That’s all we ever heard about it without any evidence of a gain in understanding by anyone. Time dilation, frames of reference, Lorentz contractions. It’s all bullshit, boys, nothing but bullshit. The same experiments prove the Cosmic Expansion Model to be the correct interpretation.

Before the Michelson-Morley experiment, physicists reasoned that light must be transmitted through a medium as are all waves. This they called the ether, but there was no other evidence of an ether. If there was an ether, reasoned the physicists, light would travel at different speeds depending on the direction of travel. The results of Michelson and Morley’s interferometer showed no difference in the velocity of light no matter which direction it went. The only possible conclusion for all was that there is no ether, the final verification of Einstein's relativity and rise to everlasting fame. But we all have minds of our own. Is it not clear enough that light is not transmitted, but propagated by a force perpendicular to the course of travel? If I’m not the smartest guy in all of history, then the truth has been deliberately withheld from the public. Other experiments also proved that the constriction of time and distance means local observers such as an interferometer would measure no difference in the velocity of light, but not that changes matching the force of gravity don’t occur on another level. I see no excuse for Mr. Einstein. His legacy wasn’t genius unless marketing the butchery of reality is genius.

It was Einstein’s own observation that a "remote" observer would see a red shifted, accelerating beam of light escaping a gravitational field and a decelerating blue shifted beam approaching a body of mass. Einstein himself had established that the speed of light is not constant over a gravitational potential difference while at the same time demonstrating how clocks and meters change to nullify those effects for local observers. Imagine that Michelson-Morley aimed their interferometer up instead of horizontal where Einstein himself claimed the speed of light should vary? Figure it out. The outward traveling beam's wavelength and speed increase for remote observers. Let's say the upward bound beam travels a million miles for one second and a downward beam travels half a million miles because its clock runs half as fast. The downward beam's meter will be only half as long, but being there are half as many wavelengths along its local path, it travels the same distance locally. The result is that no matter how far each beam travels, both will have measured identical elapsed time and distance on return to the interferometer. The beam is assisted or resisted by the expansion of space from Earth in the ether dimension depending on whether it is traveling up or down. You’ve been had.

**Conclusive Proof Of Expanding Space**The velocity of light measures the same for all local observers because it is propagated by the expansion of space outside fixed “space-time,” the same expansion responsible for the opposing force of gravity. Is it not strange that the velocity of light increases when leaving Earth while bodies of mass are pulled back towards the Earth? If only Einstein could tell us what force causes light to accelerate against the force of gravity at exactly the same rate as the force of gravity. Oh, I forgot. Einstein explains nothing.

This is the crux of it all. If the logic of great physicists before Einstein is properly applied, this can only mean that there is indeed something like an ether that assists light in one direction and resists it in the opposite. Like redshift, the effect coincides with gravitational force and can only be explained by expansion of space in a dimension outside our own. The beam moves away from the center of the Earth boosted by expanding space while a blue shifted light beam approaching Earth is opposed by the same expansion causing it to slow down by the reckoning if a remote clock with a compressed wavelength. Easy to imagine if you try. The only alternative to the expansion of space would be a physical ether streaming from the centers of mass. There is only one logical possibility. The ether is in effect the expansion of space outside the physical universe which propagates light. This is why redshift isn’t visible to local observers but clearly seen by remote observers. All the experiments credited to Einstein’s relativity prove nothing except cosmic expansion in an upper dimension that propagates light and stems from mass. Since that expansion is prevented inside the box where time and distance are conjoined, we experience the force of gravity instead of expansion.

The Michelson-Morley experiment proved what the powers didn’t want to know, that there are fixed external coordinates through which all space is expanding, and since all points are the center of expansion (the physicists got some of it right), the velocity of light is fixed in proportion to mass M of the universe plus or minus any Doppler effects caused by local objects. Therefore, relative rate of expansion determines the strength of the equal and opposite gravitational force. Expanding space at an accelerating rate outside the physical dimension is the fundamental and intrinsic property of matter that allows us to exist. This expansion is felt as the equal and opposite force of gravity in accordance with Newton’s third law of motion. Redshift from remote galaxies is no different from gravitational redshift, both being caused by recessional velocity in an expanding dimension not felt within our physical “box” but seen as the resulting redshift. Cosmic expansion can only be seen directly from outside the expanding universe at the cusp of expansion that propagates light. Hence, the Cosmic Expansion Model by Foos Research is the new and rightful model of the universe.

Expansion of space into the ethereal dimension can be measured indirectly by the Doppler shifts unreasonably attributed to gravitation. Though the expansion is not perceived, the equal and opposite force of expansion is opposed inside the box by the fixed ratio of clock speed and length and manifests as gravity. The force of stifled expansion from one object presses towards neighbors whose own expansion multiplies the combined force. The universe is a perfect sphere, not a box, of course, but the analogy of a box with well defined boundaries may be helpful.

There is no expansion perceived on the physical plane but it can be accurately calculated from either the force of gravity or redshift measurements. Another video may (or may not) help conceptualize this. Focus your magnifying glass with another YouTube video. Between the two clocks running at different rates, we now have a giant star ship specially constructed by Foos Research to give you a tour to the outer dimension to see what the world is really like. The tip of the ship is noticeably larger and reddish colored than the much narrower and bluish fins near the bottom as it awaits take off from Florida. Inside, you find a very comfortable chair to relax in. To your left is a large, specially made window. When you push the button, another realm appears in the window which you know instantly is the ether realm.

You can't make out the ether shapes because they are flying by too fast, but you measure the rate at 9.8 meters per second plus an additional 9.8 meters in the next second and again the next and the next. You want to say that the rockets have fired and you’re blasting into outer space, but when you press the window’s off button you find yourself still sitting on the launch pad. Then it hits. Gravity is an illusion. Through the window, you see that instead of feeling the force of gravity, you are being pushed by the expansion of space in the cosmic dimension just like Einstein said. But everything around you in the ethereal dimension is receding away at the same rate. You can measure exactly how fast you are moving in relation to other receding bodies by measuring the red shift between you and them. You find from the Doppler shift that you are in fact being pushed away by an expanding Earth at an accelerated rate of g, 9.8 meters per second per second. How did Einstein figure that one out?

Any remote observer other than a physicist can verify that the red shift over a meter corresponds to a Doppler velocity of 9.8 meters per second. Now we can correctly identify the most accurate remote observer as the upper dimension with fixed position relative to cosmic expansion. From your star ship window your speed relative to the receding Earth matches the Doppler red shift between you and Earth and again matches the gravitational blue shift at your position. Light doesn’t travel through an ether or through anything but is propagated or resisted by the directional expansion of space, boosting its escape from Earth and resisting it on the way back. Light travels with or against expansion matching gravity because it defines the basic rate of expansion in the universe as a whole. The velocity of light is assisted by the expansion of physical space in the ether dimension because it is carried by nothing but expansion. From your window to the ether realm you see ether mile posts flashing by as expansion of space forces you against your chair at the rate of g, the same rate of acceleration experienced by light as it leaves Earth. When shifting your window view of the ethereal dimension you may wrongly perceive your rocket has taken off at the velocity of g, but soon realize it is you who are being carried by the expansion of space at an acceleration equal to g, the force of gravity in the physical realm. The Doppler shift you observe in the ether dimension matches the gravitational red shift while sitting in your chair in the physical dimension. This is the real deal. A beam of light heading to Earth will be traveling against the rate of expansion in the ether dimension which causes it to be blue shifted. Do you see it correctly now? Do you know what causes the force of gravity? Do you know that in the ether dimension you are expanding at a velocity and rate of increase equal to the value of the local gravitational constant where gravity is holding you to your chair?

The TunnelThe Tunnel

Since we have to incorporate an ethereal dimension missing mass to explain our own lower physical dimension dominated by mass, maybe it’s fair to ask what exactly is in the ethereal dimension besides raw energy. If you were to suddenly lose your mass, what would happen? We are not robotic collections of chemicals. Your soul entered your body from the ethereal realm at conception where it has evolved over time. You simply borrowed the chemicals needed to host your temporary journey through the tunnel. I have no proof of this other than a near death experience (NDE) which is a personal, but profound experience shared by millions of trustworthy people who have had one themselves. Without exception they were never the same again. An ethereal dimension isn’t just a fact of science, but of experience for many who died on the operating table.

It is a fact that you are rocketing through space by the force of cosmic expansion even if this is not perceived. If you lose all your mass, your consciousness is instantly taken to the ether realm. You feel a burst of acceleration as you fade from the physical to the ethereal dimension. Since you are leaving the physical dimension, you may experience the Union of All Things when approaching the end of the tunnel. Most NDE experiences describe passing through the tunnel into a vivid realm without gravity or time. The tunnel is real, but only when you leave your body is it perceived. All your life you've been surfing the crest of cosmic expansion with the boundary to the ethereal dimension all around you. If you leave this universe your soul will immediately be drawn into the ether dimension at the end of the tunnel marking the boundary between physical and ethereal.

In his 1918 Dialog about “Objections to the Theory of Relativity'' Einstein sounds more like a tired old man than con artist. He emphasized the potential applicability of the ether concept in general relativity. He noted that “Lorenz brought a rigid substance embodying coordinate systems into play, but special relativity denied the existence of ether concepts. However, GRT is different,” he said, “and empty space has physical qualities characterized as the components of gravitational potential. This situation can very well be interpreted by speaking of an ether whose state varies from point to point. However, one has to be careful not to attribute to this ether any matter-like properties such as a distinct velocity at each point.” In this presentation in his own words he seeks to identify the qualities required of an ether. “Concepts might include ether as a cause of gravity, and as the source medium for the production of electric charge. The ether might conceivably take the form of a diffuse mixture of positive and negative electric charge.”

Fuzzhead or con man? Is he dodging the expansion of space into an ether dimension, or does he simply not understand the cosmic expansion model? I go back and forth, but lean towards thinking of him as an ordinary bloke who became progressively confused trying not be caught fixing his mistakes. How bizarre that makes me the greatest scientist of all time.